The question of whether the censorship of the internet is practical

Legal Resources for Digital Media Search form Search Practical Tips for Recording Phone Calls, Conversations, Meetings, and Hearings Using a recording device, such as a microphone, video recorder, or camera, is a helpful way to capture and preserve information about conversations, interviews, and phone calls in which you participate. It is also a good way to document what takes place in a court hearing or public meeting, whether for personal reference or later broadcast over the Internet. A number of laws affect your ability to use a recording device in these contexts. Here are some practical tips to help you avoid legal trouble when recording conversations, phone calls, meetings, and hearings.

The question of whether the censorship of the internet is practical

Posted on March 3, by Scott Alexander I have heard the following from a bunch of people, one of whom was me six months ago: They seem to be saying things that are either morally repugnant or utterly ridiculous.

And just as well try to give a quick summary of the sweeping elegaic paeans to a bygone age of high culture and noble virtues that is Reaction. But there is some content, and some of it is disconcerting. I started reading a little about Reaction after incessantly being sent links to various Mencius Moldbug posts, and then started hanging out in an IRC channel with a few Reactionaries including the infamous Konkvistador whom I could question about it.

Obviously this makes me the world expert who is completely qualified to embark on the hitherto unattempted project of explaining it to everyone else. Trying to sum up their ideas seems like a good way to first of all get a reference point for what their ideas are, and second of all to make it clearer why I think they deserve a rebuttal.

I have tried to be charitable towards these ideas, which means this post will be pushing politically incorrect and offensive positions.

If you do not want to read it, especially the middle parts which are about race, I would totally understand that. But if you do read it and accuse me of holding these ideas myself and get really angry, then you fail at reading comprehension forever.

I originally planned to follow this up tomorrow with the post containing my arguments against these positions, but this argument took longer than I thought to write and I expect the counterargument will as well. Expect a post critiquing reactionary ideas sometime in the next…week?

This is the post where I argue that modern society is rotten to the core, and that the only reasonable solution is to dig up King James II, clone him, and give the clone absolute control over everything.

The imperial Chinese thought nothing could beat imperial China, the medieval Spaniards thought medieval Spain was a singularly impressive example of perfection, and Communist Soviets were pretty big on Soviet Communism.

Meanwhile, we think 21st-century Western civilization, with its democracy, secularism, and ethnic tolerance is pretty neat. Since the first three examples now seem laughably wrong, we should be suspicious of the hypothesis that we finally live in the one era whose claim to have gotten political philosophy right is totally justified.

Speak out against the Chinese Empire and you lose your head. Speak out against the King of Spain and you face the Inquisition.

Speak out against Comrade Stalin and you get sent to Siberia. The great thing about western liberal democracy is that it has a free marketplace of ideas. Everybody criticizes some aspect of our society.

Noam Chomsky made a career of criticizing our society and became rich and famous and got a cushy professorship. I say we need two Stalins! You have found a way to criticize the government in Stalinist Russia and totally get away with it. Who knows, you might even get that cushy professorship.

Western society has been moving gradually further to the left for the past several hundred years at least. It went from divine right of kings to constutitional monarchy to libertarian democracy to federal democracy to New Deal democracy through the civil rights movement to social democracy to???.

No, fifty times faster!

The question of whether the censorship of the internet is practical

If you start suggesting maybe it should switch directions and move the direction opposite the one the engine is pointed, then you might have a bad time.

Go back to sterilizing the disabled and feeble-minded. If you really need convincing, suggest re-implementing segregation, or how about slavery? See how far freedom of speech gets you. In America, it will get you fired from your job and ostracized by nearly everyone.

Essay on Internet Censorship | monstermanfilm.com Blog

Depending on how loudly you do it, people may picket your house, or throw things at you, or commit violence against you which is then excused by the judiciary because obviously they were provoked.

Despite the iconic image of the dissident sent to Siberia, this is how the Soviets dealt with most of their iconoclasts too. And Western society just happens to have a really strong progressivist immune system ready to gobble you up if you say anything insufficiently progressive.

We medieval Spaniards are way too smart to fall for the balance fallacy! Since you are a citizen of a repressive society, you should be extremely skeptical of all the information you get from schools, the media, and popular books on any topic related to the areas where active repression is occurring.Censorship and Internet Essay; Censorship and Internet Essay.

Submitted By Nafew1. Words: The question as to whether the Internet should be censored will continue to be debated for many years to come. Internet Censorship Internet censorship is a very controversial topic because it goes against the First Amendment of the.

Nov 15,  · Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg appeared before the Senate's Commerce and Judiciary committees Tuesday to discuss data privacy and Russian disinformation on his social network. Internet Censorship in China: Where Does the Filtering Occur?

Xueyang Xu, Z. Morley Mao, and J. Alex Halderman China has the world’s most complex Internet censorship system, featuring IP blocking, keyword filtering, DNS hijacking and so on [1]. IP blocking is the This paper answers the question whether all censorship occurs at border.

Content-control software, commonly referred to as an internet filter, is software that restricts or controls the content an Internet user is capable to access, especially when utilised to restrict material delivered over the Internet via the Web, e-mail, or other monstermanfilm.comt-control software determines what content will be available or be blocked.

MARCELO GLEISER Physicist, Dartmouth College; Author, The Prophet and the Astronomer To Unify or Not: That is the Question. I grew up infused with the idea of unification. It came first from religion, from my Jewish background.

The internet is a big place, with a lot of content. Over one billion websites at the time of writing.

The Future of Free Speech, Trolls, Anonymity and Fake News Online. Many experts fear uncivil and manipulative behaviors on the internet will persist – and may get worse. Internet Censorship in China: Where Does the Filtering Occur? Xueyang Xu, Z. Morley Mao, and J. Alex Halderman China has the world’s most complex Internet censorship system, featuring IP blocking, keyword filtering, DNS hijacking and so on [1]. IP blocking is the This paper answers the question whether all censorship occurs at border. The internet is a big place, with a lot of content. Over one billion websites at the time of writing. With the web constantly changing, it’s hard to keep track of which sites have the best content and resources. To help make things easier, we’ve compiled this enormous list of the best websites.

With the web constantly changing, it’s hard to keep track of which sites have the best content and resources. To help make things easier, we’ve compiled this enormous list of the best websites.

THE WORLD QUESTION CENTER — Page 2